Visitor Comments
When one discovers what one's parents have done to one, one realises what one has done to one's children.
- Rodney
I believe this is suggesting the undesirability of 'rebirth;' we can all look back at times in history and say 'I am glad I wasn't born at that period?' We never know what the future holds in store.
- Nick
Attachment to the material realm brings suffering. Escape what binds you to that realm, especially the six senses. We may manifest God through our bodies, but as material creatures we are finite and suffer loss, pain, and death. Rid yourself of the source of suffering. Seek only to reflect the light of the source of all.
- Zooie
|
Scholarly Quotes
Robert M. Grant and David Noel Freedman write: "The first part of this saying comes from Luke 11:27-28, though the word 'nourished' is derived from Luke 23:29, which Thomas uses as the second part of the saying. The word of the Father, then, is that sterility is better than pregnancy. Just so, in the Gospel of the Egyptians, Salome says to Jesus, 'I did well, then, by not bearing [children]' (Clement of Alexandria, Strom., 3, 66, 2). For Jesus really came 'to destroy the works of the female' (Strom., 3, 63, 2)." (The Secret Sayings of Jesus, p. 179)
R. McL. Wilson writes: "Once again, as Grant and Freedman show, it is not difficult to find a Gnostic explanation, but this does not mean the association of sayings from entirely different contexts. The obvious suggestion is association by key-words, the references to womb and breasts having caused the attraction of the second saying ot the first; yet the whole fits well together, and it might be argued that it was originally a unity." (Studies in the Gospel of Thomas, p. 81)
F. F. Bruce writes: "Two quite independent sayings are conflated here. Jesus's reply to the woman who says how wonderful it must be to be his mother indicates that to do the will of God is more wonderful still (Luke 11.27 f.), but this is merged with his words to the weeping woman on the Via Dolorosa (Luke 23.29). The two sayings are linked by the common theme of bearing and suckling children, but the historical perspective of the second (the impending siege and capture of Jerusalem in A.D. 70) is here replaced by a suggestion that motherhood is incompatible with 'hearing the Father's word and keeping it in truth'. As regularly (except in Saying 100), 'God' in the canonical text is here replaced by 'the Father'." (Jesus and Christian Origins Outside the New Testament, p. 143)
Funk and Hoover write: "Thom 79:3, which has a parallel in Luke 23:29, has possibly been retained by Thomas because of its ascetic interest: the procreation of the race is not necessarily a good thing. This kind of asceticism seems to have been shared by the Qumran community, which some scholars believe was celibate, although it must be noted that not all Essenes were celibate." (The Five Gospels, p. 516)
Gerd Ludemann writes: "The basis of these verses is Luke 11.27-28, as v. 28 derives from Lukan redaction and 'word of the Father' (v. 2) clearly derives from the redaction of Thomas. 'Word of the Father' is typical of Thomas, as he avoids the term 'God'. 'Truth' (v. 2) picks up the same word from 78.3." (Jesus After 2000 Years, p. 630)
|
